Internet Explorer Version 8 and 10 minutes to get football results in the brave new digital TV world

As a part-time web designer I find IE8 has gone from the extreme of earlier issues to the other extreme in terms of using web-standards. My web-design software puts special code into pages to allow for the foibles of earlier versions of Internet Explorer. Now I find that even using the latest updates from Adobe to create code the CSS on my sites doesn’t render correctly in IE8 without clicking on ‘compatibility view’ which I’m not using.

Who-ever in Microsoft invented ‘compatibility view’ must have had a very strict upbringing, it’s a completely unnecessary discipline. Firefox has been the recommended tool for checking websites and I find nothing has changed.

Microsoft also upset some people by enforcing use of the Outlook Connector on Hotmail accounts.  It forced me to tidy up my e-mail accounts and it was goodbye to Hotmail.  If you own domains you can use forwarding addresses so changing isn’t difficult.

The latest version of Windows (Windows 7) is out tomorrow and seems to have had good reviews to date.  I’ll let it settle as Vista seems pretty good now.  Although I wonder if we’ll ever get to the time when you turn on your PC and start work immediately. My Quad core Vista PC takes minutes to boot up.

With the digital switch-over I’ll miss terrestrial TV teletext in that I can put on the TV and go straight to the football results in seconds – unless it’s one of those multi-page ones. The BBC Digital Text on Sky takes about 2 minutes to come on and switching it off is something else.  Maybe using mobile phone web is the faster answer but it costs. We step bravely into the future and it seems like walking in mud, overly complicated mud.

What about older folk. It wasn’t too bad once just turning a switch to operate the TV.  We once had a TV with a little box screwed on the back containing a fairly substantial metal rod which you pulled to get ITV. Set top boxes aren’t new.

Oh no, just remembered we turn off our Sky Box as a ‘green’ measure but find that after switch on it takes 5 minutes to find all the channels.  Teletext will be so missed. It’ll be 5 minutes to get the channels, 2 minutes to get to the text.  Then another couple of minutes to load the page. So it could be 10 minutes to get the football results with a Sky Box. Need to think about that!

Posted in Not particularly Preston, Technology | Comments Off on Internet Explorer Version 8 and 10 minutes to get football results in the brave new digital TV world

Grosvenor pull out of Tithebarn

Grosvenor pulled out of the £700m Preston Tithebarn development today saying they want to focus on smaller developments.  Lend Lease the other developer say they are staying in. It had seemed Grosvenor were the major developer but on looking at the Land Lease website they have involvement in a lot of large projects worldwide.

The project has been on the boards for a long time, is very ambitious, faces opposition from everyone not in Preston, is subject to a planning inquiry and there are attempts to list the main building to be knocked down.  Maybe this is standard fare in such developments and developers just keep chipping away and re-structuring their portfolios, but to the uninitiated it sounds like a story of continuous obstacles.  Grosvenor have spent quite a bit of money already buying up properties and in the planning process so there is a risk of making a loss on work to date and you might have thought that their commitment would have assured their continuation.

I’ve never been fully pro or anti-Tithebarn and my opinion changes as I read different articles. There is no doubt that Preston is a strange design overall and Tithebarn isn’t going to help.  Other factors such as; will a new high speed line go through Preston or round it or maybe not go this far north, will Preston be a stop for High Speed Trains, should the bus station and railway station be closer and link better to the motorway. Why is the shopping area going to be split between the railway station end of Fishergate and the Tithebarn area. The bus station is one of Preston’s most commented buildings and it is to be knocked down. Tithebarn doesn’t seem to help these.  On the plus side probably from the council’s view if someone is willing to put in money all these issues are the lesser of the evils of running down and unemployment.

Posted in Made in Preston | Comments Off on Grosvenor pull out of Tithebarn

North v South and the meaning of life

Watched John Prescott on TV last night with his wife on the subject of north v south.  Quite like John Prescott he’s a down to earth type who can stand his corner, although him and his wife especially like their fancy trimmings.

The programme touched on a few things that I’ve often thought such as the north grew out of industry and now the industry is gone what is the future.  Does it have a meaning?  A study was discussed that said some towns – I noticed Blackpool, Wigan and Blackburn on the list – should be left to rot as their purpose was gone.  To which John said if those people that could moved out you’d be left with the old and the unwanted which would lead to major social problems. So jobs must be moved to people. Although maybe his social problems could also include a fear of extreme political parties getting seats in parliament.

Yet these jobs need to have some meaning and ambition.  The region needs to have a meaning and some symbolic industries yet it seems hard to imagine what that is at present except for a mixed portfolio of foreign owned industries.  The few major industries remaining include defence and chemicals. Some headquarters need to be located in the region. The only ones I can think of are the Co-op which isn’t industrial and Pilkingtons which somehow managed to be taken by over a smaller  Japanese company. After 12 years of a government that you might think would try to spread wealth around the country it seems the north has a fairly transitory base and the only businesses based here were devastated by the credit crunch and allowed to collapse – Bradford & Bingley, Northern Rock to name two. A bit depressing if you let it be.  In someways a case for a breakaway country from the south could be made but I’d have no confidence of its success and I’d imagine it would be an unhappy socialist enclave. Although some Welsh and Scots think they can do it and I’d think the Welsh are further downhill than the north. So like the recession maybe this is a low point and the future is up but some higher than others.

Posted in Not particularly Preston, Political, Uncategorized | Comments Off on North v South and the meaning of life

Visit to Manchester

Drove to Manchester for a Saturday excursion, weather was very nice as well. Almost didn’t when we heard about the demonstration planned but we didn’t see anything like that although police on horseback were prominent.

Manchester gets more impressive each time we go. I was particularly impressed by the Spinningfields area with its modern buildings, open areas, apartments and cafes. Although there was one building right in the middle that looked a bit 70’s shabby.

The extension to the Arndale is a nice bright area making the old one look ancient although that’s been facelifted as well. There’s quite a good circular route down King Street, Market Street, back into the Arndale and the extension then onto the Triangle, Selfridges etc to St Annes Square.  There was a food market in St Annes Square that looked interesting.

Another thing I hadn’t seen before is the HMV GameBase in the basement a room of monitors and gamestations for computer battlers. Pretty impressive I thought although there was no-one using any at 11am on Saturday so I wonder where the trade is coming from.

Overall a pretty good day out, didn’t spend anything except £5.40 to park the car and a lunch, although my wife did. Can’t see Preston matching that even with 5 Tithebarn Projects.

Posted in Not particularly Preston, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Visit to Manchester

Duke of Edinburgh’s wise words about TV technology

The Duke of Edinburgh is reported as saying TV remotes are too complex.   I guess over 95% of the population are probably able to use them eventually without difficulty even if they don’t use all the functions. I have an elderly relative who now has a Set Top Box as part of the BBC / Government scheme for the elderly and hasn’t yet been able to master the technology.  Got the box fitted by a friendly young man, got some training, we wrote it down and repeated it several times. What it doesn’t say is what happens if you accidently catch the button next to the TV on button. Yes it turns the whole thing off. So what happens then. Panic.  I thought it can’t be that bad and had a go. But I got an information screen with a small window showing the picture and I couldn’t get rid of it without turning everything off. There’s a lag as well so you can’t be certain if the button you last pressed is about to do something or if you missed it. So yes the Duke of Edinburgh is right.  Where is the remote with just a few buttons?  Why the lag between press and effect?

The Government are hell bent on turning off FM radio as well. The UK has taken an independant route using a low fidelity first generation DAB technology and the rest of Europe is different. I’ve had a high quality FM receiver for years, it will probably outlast me and gives excellent sound reproduction that I also feed the TV through.  In 4 years it will go to landfill because the government wants to use the spectrum for mobile phones or something.  So here we go again high tech, low quality.

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Duke of Edinburgh’s wise words about TV technology

Councillors Driver and Hudson man the barricades

Two councillors, Geoff Driver of Lancashire County Council and Ken Hudson of Preston City Council have had a letter published in the Times (8th Oct)  defending the location of the National Football Museum in Preston.  This was after Matt Dickinson the Times Chief Sports Correspondent had written the museum should be at Wembley (6thOct).

Matt said he liked the museum but it’s one drawback was it is in Preston. Well he would say that as it’s a typical London reaction to anything they have to travel to even though Preston is surrounded by Premier and Football League clubs.  Last time I went to London we passed Wembley at 100 mph and it was quite a journey to Euston. On my previous trip from central London to Wembley I got a headache from the long slow claustrophobic journey, we don’t have such horror journey’s in our area.  Would anyone make such a such a journey to go to the museum when there is so much else to see in London?  At Preston you slip off the motorway and in under 10 minutes you are in the museum having parked free and suffered little traffic.

Another advantage of Preston is that the club is fairly neutral. I’ve met people in Liverpool who won’t go to Manchester or even say the word.  

There is a previous post setting these points out more clearly so I leave that topic.

Changing the subject a bit, I hope Rupert Murdoch won’t be upset that I’ve referenced one of his news products without paying an on-line news fee, ref todays Times. Then again I have paid £1.80 for the two copies of the Times and I think that’s excessive even though the main paper is a good read. Can I have a cheaper option without the unwanted supplements. If a charge for internet news comes in one of them will go.  Although I would imagine that a fee for viewing a package of publications could be arranged as I can’t see anyone paying to read a single news source on line.  I think I’d agree that a moderate fee for viewing a range of news sources might be acceptable although I’d have to consider my whole internet / newspaper / TV package  as I don’t believe in giving a monopoly or tying myself in to any one provider.

Posted in Preston North End, Technology | 2 Comments

Preston FM your community radio

Driving round Preston the other day a radio station I hadn’t heard of popped onto my radio. Preston FM 103.2MHz. Sounded a bit ‘localish’ although I’ve listened to a couple of their music programmes and they’re OK. So I’m giving it a go through their on-line feed at the moment. The schedule says ‘chat’ show but it’s been uninterrupted music.  As a volunteer and charity funded station it’s worth a go.

If you’re living overseas and want to hear some homely Preston voices then maybe there’s a good reason to listen on line.

Maybe they should do some traffic announcements as that seems to be how most stations get listeners although for me it also can cause hostility. comm

Preston FM website:

http://www.preston.fm/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/

Posted in Made in Preston, Technology | Comments Off on Preston FM your community radio

International and National powerplay week

Interesting week.  Irish vote to sign the EU Reform Treaty also known  as the Lisbon Treaty. It’s now a bit of a tightrope for the Conservatives as to whether the Poles and Czechs sign before an election in the UK. If the Conservatives win and it’s not signed then a referendum is likely in the UK. Some people think a referendum should be held anyway. The trouble with this is that the objectors are making a lot of noise but it isn’t clear if they are representative when it comes to the crunch.  Personally I think there should not be a referendum on this treaty as I’ve not been convinced it makes a significant change to the sovereignty of the UK.

The IMF is looking to reform to be more representative and it has been suggested that countries like the UK might lose their seat. I guess this could also be a precursor to losing a Security Council seat as well. On the other hand the UK is the 7th biggest economy and has political and military influence that is significant both historically and from it’s position as a major member of the EU. If the G20 is symbolic of how these things run it’s a bit of an odd grouping as the 20 aren’t the biggest in any one sense so even in an economic grouping financial clout isn’t the main factor. There is nothing to suggest at the moment that the UK will cease to be in the top 10 economies for many years so how any restructuring occurs is subject to debate.  Although personally I favour the EU representing Europe in duality for now but perhaps taking over from individual nations at some point. Although for me it’s complicated as I’m pro-pound, pro-EU and think David Cameron is OK but I’m not certain.

The SNP are demanding a seat in any debate of leaders that is shown in Scotland. I agree with this. It is probable that the SNP will be the biggest party in Scotland after the General Election and as such they should be given equal billing in Scotland.   The Conservatives will likely get into power with a predominantly Southern England base and although this might once have seemed a non-issue, nowadays it questions the validity of the electoral process. Gordon Brown has hinted at some kind of reform but I wouldn’t like to hold my breath even if he was likely to win.

Another interesting point is that the SNP are looking to hold a referendum on Scottish Independance. It isn’t clear if they have enough power to do that at present or if they’d win. But if a Conservative government was elected by Southern England with no seats in Scotland I’d think it would strengthen the SNP.  Although, as a side point, is it possible in some cases for votes to be split between SNP and Labour to give the seat to the Conservatives. So going back to the original point in this post, assuming Scotland became independant and knocked 8% off the size of the UK then it might reduce the ability to defend the seats at the IMF and UN. On the other hand the World Bank forecasts that even with a 10% reduction the UK will still be the 7th largest in 5yrs time. Although Brazil, Russia and India are on a trajectory that might change that in 10yrs, but there are so many if’s here. So the Scottish effect although significant isn’t critical for now in powerplay. Although I’d think it will have some effect.

Posted in Not particularly Preston, Political, Uncategorized | Comments Off on International and National powerplay week

BAE SYSTEMS and SFO

BAE SYSTEMS, the biggest high tech employer in Lancashire and the UK, is in the news today. The Serious Fraud Office are saying they will ask the Attorney General to press charges with a punitive £1000 million fine for offering alleged incentives to obtain business in 2 EU and 2 African countries.   This is on top of the talk of defence cuts that might injure BAE.

The Lib Dem spokesman is in for the kill, appearing on every broadcast, adamant that this is shocking behaviour although his opinion on other similar shocking behaviour isn’t widely known so maybe he doesn’t like the defence industry.

Just before an election will Gordon Brown fire these arrows into the heart of Britains largest manufacturing company or is he more pragmatic?  BAE SYSTEMS has changed its management and is reported to be agreeable to some compromise.

In the last 10 years large British manufacturing businesses have nearly all disappeared or been taken over by foreign companies.  An injured company with good products is prey.

Take the water companies they were said to be too fat so they got a windfall tax. Next thing they are owned by the French.  How much will BAE be damaged, the shares went down 4% today which doesn’t seem too much although they had already fallen in the last few weeks.  How much will this injure the company and who would be interested in taking the business or breaking it up?

Posted in Aviation, Political, Technology | Comments Off on BAE SYSTEMS and SFO

Preston Bus v Stagecoach competition inquiry

The Evening Post alerted me to the Competition Commission (CC) report issued on 3rd September 2009 relating to Stagecoach taking over Preston Bus Limited. The CC have quite a good website and there is a lot of stuff related to this inquiry. In fact it’s a very big read with a few hundred pages on this case alone.

The output says they provisionally believe there will be a significant lessening of competition (SLC) in commercial bus services  but not in tendered bus services after submissions from a broad base of involved parties.

On the face of it that seems fairly obvious. As does the statment in the report that Preston Bus and other local operators feared competition from Stagecoach and so were restricted in opening any routes that might be thought to be threatening. Also that Stagecoach feared Preston Bus being taken over by another large operator. Although that isn’t to say the report isn’t worthwhile as it contains interesting information that would not have otherwise been public.

The report says the Stagecoach Frenchwood garage was one of the least profitable so in my opinion it isn’t hard to imagine that Stagecoach would seek ways to improve it although at the time maybe Preston Bus didn’t know Stagecoach had such a strong need.  Small bus operators are bound to be at a disadvantage against larger companies. The only protection they could have would either need to be legislative or through loyalty of customers. In this case the people of Preston seem to have voted to travel on Stagecoach buses to a level that made Preston Bus struggle. Unfortunately it wouldn’t need that many to have done that.

There is local pride, sentimentality and a sense of control in having the name of the city on the buses but when it comes to business those factors don’t pay any bills.  The provision of bus services is one where competition is fierce and the players are circling each other all the time. That no-one else was willing to buy Preston Bus for a decent price during the competition, as stated in the report, meant that Stagecoach had played their hand well.

My own opinion is that Stagecoach got a bad reputation in the early days of deregulation when they were building up their business but since then they have maintained a decent fleet and provide a good service. Any business is going to look to make the best of its resources and in general if you are not growing you are shrinking in the world of consolidating globalism. Preston Bus was quite vulnerable and Stagecoach are operating on a national and international scale. On the other hand I would have liked the buses to have kept their livery and the badge of Preston on their side. A world of bland uniformity might be our destiny as we pop out of WH Smith and onto the Stagecoach in Lancaster and for a moment thought you were in Preston. How much do you want to pay for diversity or are council tax and bus fares high enough?

Posted in Political, Road, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Preston Bus v Stagecoach competition inquiry

Swine Flu or Cold?

My aged mother-in-law has travelled to see us and brought a cold which I now have. It seems like a cold but is it Swine Flu?

Checking on the NHS website it says;

If you or a member of your family has a fever or high temperature (over 38°C/100.4°F) and two or more of the following symptoms, you may have swine flu:

  • unusual tiredness,
  • headache,
  • runny nose,
  • sore throat,
  • shortness of breath or cough,
  • loss of appetite,
  • aching muscles,
  • diarrhoea or vomiting.

I feel hot and have a runny nose, a bit of a sore throat and a bit of a headache. But it feels like what I’ve always thought a Cold. Is it that I always had Swine Flu? Can I be arrested for continuing life as normal without asking for free Tamiflu? If I was at school or work maybe I’dtake a sick day although I probably only had a couple of months off in nearly 40 years of work so probably not. It’s a Cold anyway and not even a bad one.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Swine Flu or Cold?

Council Tax v Local Income Tax – Liberal Democrats

Vince Cable was on the BBC just now getting a bit shirty that he was being asked questions about his supplementary tax on houses valued over £1million. As I’m against any new tax that brings a foot in the door for future increases I thought the BBC reporter was asking good questions.

The other thin end of the wedge is the clear statement that a form of council tax will be used to reduce income tax which is the opposite principle to what many people want, e.g. road tax pays for roads.

The other side is that there is some truth in the Liberal Democrat position.  Most people pay council tax on a sliding scale but when it gets to a certain point it ceases to slide. There is no council tax band above H which in general means a cap of £3,000 per household on council tax.

A halfpenny on the increment above £1m, say it was on a house worth £2m would be £5,000. If you live in a £2m house £5,000 a year or £400 a month is big enough to prick I’d think, coupled with the new 50p tax rate in some cases. So it’s too much. Therefore I’d support additional council tax bands with an increment of a few hundred between each as now although there are losers and exceptions with whatever system.

I vote that the Sage of Twickenham has got it wrong on this matter.

The Lib Dems are also supporting Local Income Tax. This can be paid as an increment on Income Tax. I’m not sure where the break even point is. Is it that a house with 1 average wage taxpayer breaks even with the current system? Those with large incomes or say 2-3 low to middling incomes will pay more. Sounds a bit iffy.

Then the Lib Dems want to make the tax threshold £10,000 so presumably you won’t pay council tax if you earn less than £10,000.  I’ve long thought the tax threshold way too low and for Labour to actually make poorer people pay more tax by removing the 10p rate is astounding.

To take this a bit further the Lib Dems also support the re-valuation of houses for council tax purposes in England, if council tax continues. Personally I fully support this as our house was right at the bottom of a band. Although in Wales it turned out that most houses went up a band. If the charge on bands came down I’d say that was OK as the overall tax demand should not change. In Wales it appears to have been a money grabbing exercise. Can this be avoided in England. Probably not.

In general the Lib Dems have some interesting points here although I’m not sure whether I agree with the way they are being implemented or if they are safe to be implemented. I’ve never voted LD and doubt I ever will as they’re soft on too many subjects, although they have moved in a more flavourful direction.

Posted in Political | 2 Comments

Sustainable house standards – 2016 and all that

There has been talk in the news recently about the standards for houses to meet ‘low carbon’ requirements.

Developers say it will cost £30,000 to meet the 2016 ‘zero carbon’ standard. Although it is also said the cost is overstated and the effect understated. It would be interesting to see a breakdown of this cost as newly fitted thicker insulation and efficient boilers probably don’t cost a lot more. So there must be some big cost drivers to be exposed.

Below I’ve found some examples of what it might entail. It seems only the self generating capacity is a significant new cost. The cost of this would come down if it became widespread. Also  local areas could install their own systems to reduce costs.

Then there is the forecast cost of fuel. There are websites saying energy costs could reach £5000 a year if price increases over the last few years continue. Obviously this depends on the dates you pick and maybe if you picked the last 12 months then energy costs could be forecast to be zero in 20 years. So what is a reasonable figure?

A lot depends on cost effectiveness as we can’t spend limitlessly on the assumption of global warming. For example if we insulate and the temperature goes up then maybe we don’t need it. If it rains all the time then maybe solar power won’t do much good. Wind seems probable, etc. Is any of this based on metereological data and reasonable assumptions?

I’ve a lot to find out to be convinced, particularly being wary of who is presenting what figures and why. Although in general I support minimising human effect on the environment for whatever purpose if it creates a better Earth for everything on it.

The government issued a paper on house standards, dated 2006.  It uses code levels to cover the standard.

Level 1 is slightly better than todays regulations. An example of what might meet the standard;

The home will have to be 10% more energy efficient than one built to the 2006 Building Regulations standards. This could be achieved by:
• Improving the thermal efficiency of the walls, windows, and roof (by using more insulation or better glass for example);
• Reducing air permeability, that is by improving the control of the fresh air into a home, and the stale air out of a home. (A certain amount of air ventilation is needed in a home for health reasons);
• Installing a high efficiency condensing boiler;
• Carefully designing the fabric of the home to reduce thermal bridging (thermal bridging allows heat to easily escape between the inner walls and the outer walls of a home).
The home will have to be designed to use no more than about 120 litres of water per person per day. This could be achieved by fitting a number of items such as:
• 6/4 Dual Flush WC;
• Flow Reducing/Aerating taps throughout;
• 6-9 litres per minute shower (note that an average electric shower is about 6/7 litres per minute;
• 18ltr maximum volume dishwasher;
• 60ltr maximum volume washing machine.
Other minimum requirements are required for:
• Surface water management – this may mean the provision of soakaways and areas of porous paving;
• Materials – this means a minimum number of materials meeting at least a ‘D’ grade in the Building Research Establishment’s Green Guide (the scale goes from A+ to E);
• Waste management – this means having a site waste management plan in place during the home’s construction, and adequate space for waste storage during its use.

But to get to Level 1 you need a further 33.3 points. So the builder/developer must do other things to obtain the other points such as:
• Providing accessible drying space (so that tumble dryers need not be used);
• Providing more energy efficient lighting (taking into account the needs of disabled people with visual impairments);
• Providing cycle storage;
• Providing a room that can be easily set up as a home office;
• Reducing the amount of water than runs off the site into the storm drains;
• Using environmentally friendly materials;
• Providing recycling capacity either inside or outside the home.

Level 6 Example of a Carbon Neutral house for 2016;

The home meeting any level of the Code will have to meet minimum standards for certain items depending on what Level is desired. For Level 6 this means:
The home will have to be completely zero carbon (i.e. zero net emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from all energy use in the home). This could be achieved by:
• Improving the thermal efficiency of the walls, windows, and roof as far as is practically possible (by using more insulation or better glass for example);
• Reducing air permeability to the minimum consistent with health requirements (a certain amount of air ventilation is needed in a home for health reasons);
• Installing a high efficiency condensing boiler, or being on a district heating system;
• Carefully designing the fabric of the home to reduce thermal bridging (thermal bridging allows heat to easily escape between the inner walls and the outer walls of a home);
• Using low and zero carbon technologies such as solar thermal panels, biomass boilers, wind turbines, and combined heat and power systems (CHP). It would mean for example that energy taken from the national grid would have to be replaced by low or zero carbon generated energy, so that over a year the net emissions were zero.

The home will have to be designed to use no more than about 80 litres of water per person per day. This could be achieved by fitting such items as:
• 6/4 Dual Flush WC;
• Flow Reducing/Aerating taps throughout;
• 6-9 litres per minute shower (note that an average electric shower is about 6/7 litres per minute);
• a smaller, shaped bath – still long enough to lie down in, but less water required to fill it to a level consistent with personal comfort;
• 18ltr maximum volume dishwasher;
• 60ltr maximum volume washing machine.
To achieve the standard would also mean that about 30% of the water requirement of the home was provided from non-potable sources such as rainwater harvesting systems or grey water recycling systems.
Other minimum requirements are required for:
• Surface water management – this may mean the provision of soakaways and areas of porous paving;
• Materials – this means a minimum number of materials meeting at least a ‘D’ grade in the Building Research Establishment’s Green Guide (the scale goes from A+ to E);
• Waste management – this means having a site waste management plan in place during the home’s construction, and adequate space for waste storage during its use.
But to get to Level 6 you need a further 64.9 points. So the builder/developer must do many other things to obtain the other points. In fact they will need to do 90% of everything in the

Code to achieve Level 6, including:
• Energy efficient appliances, and lighting;
• Supplying accessible water butts;
• Reducing surface water run-off as much as possible;
• Using highly environmentally friendly materials;
• Minimising construction waste;
• Maximum, accessible provision for recycling;
• Improved daylighting, sound insulation and security;
• Building to the Lifetime Homes standard;
• Assessing and minimising the ecological impact of the construction of the home.

Is the above Good or Bad?

With the exception of generating power there is nothing there that looks particularly taxing. I’m not sure what grade D materials are though. In general I support it but want to watch the costs.

Retrofitting a lot of the existing housing will be a big challenge and the use of home generating sounds idealistic. I’d assume that localities could take it in their own hands to set up local power generators.  Also windows and walls could be expensive to replace before they are worn and maybe there is no economic case for doing this unless energy prices increase significantly. One council fitted external cladding to houses at a cost of £4000 to £6000 a house. There are about 25 million dwellings in the UK and only about 100,000 are being built at present so the new standards will take a very long time to have any effect if they are restricted to new build.

The 2006 code for sustainable homes is on the link below.

http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/code_for_sust_homes.pdf

Posted in Not particularly Preston, Technology, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Sustainable house standards – 2016 and all that

It’s bad news week, but PNE won at the end

There was such a song but following on from my post about Tuesday being a bad day last week it seems there was more to come.  So most posts were bad news last week.

However PNE beat Coventry 3-2 so relieving the worry that the bubble had burst. Coventry only getting their second in the last minute.

Posted in Made in Preston, Preston North End | Comments Off on It’s bad news week, but PNE won at the end

Royal Lancashire Show not at Preston

I read in the LEP that the Royal Lancashire Show will not be held in Preston although they said in 2012 it could participate in the Guild. The RLS committee are discussing another site although with their history of site selection maybe Preston is lucky as where-ever it is will surely be under water at that time.

I did think that it was an opportunity to ‘bring the country to the town’ and gain some cross culture understanding. Although I can understand the country folk and their audience maybe thinking that a more rural or suburban setting might be more appropriate to give added atmosphere.  The potential location was not declared today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Royal Lancashire Show not at Preston

Tithebarn Public inquiry

I heard it on Radio Lancashire, the government have announced that a public inquiry is to be held into whether Preston should be allowed to have a project as large as the Tithebarn. In effect the government are sort of putting Prestons investment onto a back burner. Even in these times when money is too hard to mention and it will create good jobs in the short term.

Like the Casino announcement in Blackpool there is a Manchester element in this as people from Manchester have been players in both judgements.  To cross the path of Labours pet city, Manchester, and a town with a senior minister as MP, Blackburn,  is opposition that Preston will find difficult.

Sounds like there might be a new government before the inquiry is finished so it will be too late for a cost cutting exercise to save £800,000. Although knowing the cynicism of pubic financing the inquiry will probably be cancelled and counted as an £800,000 ‘cut’.

On the other hand I’ve never been fully convinced of the project as I’m suspicious of developers who like the bankers see only money as an outcome. I guess I’d be sympathetic to that except that as you get older, say 50ish, you begin to realise that the visible trail from long ago to now has a value as well.   Even so a Public Inquiry costing £800,000 and taking a long time seems extravagent.

Posted in Made in Preston, Political, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tithebarn Public inquiry

Bad day for Preston

Tuesday 15th September wasn’t a good day for Preston.

Job losses announced in the area at BAE SYSTEMS.

George Osborne saying he would cancel the Typhoon.

PNE lost at Scunthorpe in their first defeat of the season.

Sean St Ledger moves to Middlesbrough.

Maybe if you have a pension at BAE George scrapping the aircraft carriers and A400M won’t be good news either.

I’ll add more bad news as it comes in.

The weather was OK though.

Posted in Made in Preston | Comments Off on Bad day for Preston

Smart Meters, any use?

I was reading an article by Ed Milliband saying smart meters will give us a responsive more efficient electricity grid, enable billing without a meter reader and for consumers to be aware of what they using. All this at a cost of a few £bn.

Maybe we’re unusual but I can’t imagine any savings in our house. I know the hot water, freezer, electric cooker, tv, pc and lights use electricity.  We don’t leave switches or heat only the air. My own concern is that someone said that a person in Sweden saved 15% of their fuel, but that this was the only person and they left the fire on all day.

I just can’t see how reducing meter men and getting adjustable bills can be worth the cost.  The power companies are pretty good at regulating output and it’s a blunt instrument with whole power stations going on and off.   They did say that it would allow people to feed into the grid, although I would have thought that these exceptions would buy their own meter. If this is so good then presumably the power companies are funding it at no extra cost to anyone?

The other device I saw advertised was a voltage regulator that claims to reduce bills by reducing your voltage to 230Volts. It was aimed at businesses and domestic. In our house maybe our TV will work on 230V but our immersion heater will just give out less power and so be on longer. The freezer might work the same at 230V as it said motors show savings. At a cost of £300 to £400 installed that’s a years electricity for us and it would probably take over 10 years to pay back, if ever. Some hard facts about savings on different appliances would be useful.

Posted in Political, Technology | Comments Off on Smart Meters, any use?

St Ledger loaned by PNE to Middlesbrough

As forecast Sean St Ledger, the PNE and Irish international defender, has left for Middlesbrough. The LEP is reporting a fee of £4.5m expected in January.  As usual mixed feelings about losing a good player and getting a good fee.  The Premier League is littered with ex-PNE players although PNE keep up the good performances.

I often think there is a risk about a loan. What if he doesn’t get on or found not to be worth that much?   Then again he’s OK here, so PNE get their better player back.

We need to tell ourselves there are about 60 Coca-Cola league clubs out of 68 who’d swap places with PNE anyday.

Posted in Preston North End | Comments Off on St Ledger loaned by PNE to Middlesbrough

Potential Redundancies at BAE SYSTEMS announced

BAE SYSTEMS press report says that 375 local jobs will be lost, 205 at Samlesbury and 170 at Warton. In addition in 2012 the Woodford in Manchester site will be closed with a loss of 630 jobs following completion of Nimrod work. Farnborough has 116 jobs less on Harrier.

The Samlesbury work is said to come with the end of Airbus work for Spirit Aerosystems who are a US based aero-structures company. I was looking at their website and noted that they have recently opened a site in Malaysia and the work to be done there sounded similar to that they quoted at Samlesbury (and Prestwick), including carbon fibre structural components which sound like the high end of capability.

At Warton the job reduction is in manufacturing Tornado, Hawk and Nimrod.

The unions are reported in the LEP as saying that they wish to avoid compulsory redundancy. I don’t know how the F35 / JSF work builds up but it is surprising that with the large quantities forecast for this project that there is a reduction. Particularly at Samlesbury and the total number locally sounds small enough to manage with voluntary arrangements.

On top of that BAE SYSTEMS have recently been trumpeting their UAV projects and although these might be a long way from production quantities that would sustain a workforce they add more scope for jobs in future.

Defence companies have recently been lobbying parliament about maintaining projects and maybe this is a demonstration of the fragility of the workload.

In the UK we are good at defence products, along with pharmaceuticals and finance (sic). Let’s keep them strong.

Posted in Aviation | Comments Off on Potential Redundancies at BAE SYSTEMS announced